Three developers. Five weeks. Every deadline held.
A partner agency re-engaged Ghost Sherpa to build a dynamic, high-motion website for Azultera, a land regeneration business, matching the quality of an existing site within a tight timeframe. Three developers ran concurrently. The timeline held.
Client
Azultera
Model
Project-Based
Scope
Web Development
Timeline
5 Weeks
The Challenge
The primary technical challenge was replicating technically complex transitions and motion elements across diverse devices and screen types. Azultera's existing brand presence set a high visual standard, and the new site had to match it: dynamic parallax effects, smooth transitions, and interactive elements that accompanied a user through the experience rather than just presenting information.
The development team was operating on a tight timeframe, which meant the coordination had to be airtight from day one.
The Engagement
Ghost Sherpa deployed three developers working concurrently across the build. To bring the required dynamism to the experience, the team implemented parallax effects and dynamic transitions throughout. The final deliverable included four heroes with parallax effects, a draggable module, and additional dynamic elements that guided users through the site.
Effective communication across the team was the thing that held the timeline. With three developers building simultaneously, coordination gaps become delivery gaps. None appeared.
“Your seamless collaboration, clarity, and dedication allowed us to deliver a high-quality web solution to the client, fully meeting their expectations. This success is a direct result of our collective effort and commitment.”
Juan Cruz Mel
Project Manager, Ghost Sherpa
What was built.
4 heroes
Full parallax hero sections delivered across the site
Draggable Module
Interactive drag element built into the user flow alongside additional dynamic components
5 wks
Full delivery from kickoff to completion, on the partner agency's required timeline
Why this matters for you
High-motion development on a tight timeline isn't a staffing problem. It's a coordination problem.
Parallax effects, dynamic transitions, and interactive modules are not technically exotic. What makes them hard on tight timelines is keeping multiple developers in sync on a moving build. When the coordination breaks down, the experience breaks down with it, inconsistent behavior across breakpoints, transitions that work in one browser and break in another, features that are done but not integrated.
Ghost Sherpa's project-based model includes the coordination layer, not just the developers. That's why the timeline held.
Next Step
Have a high-motion web build on a deadline your current team can't absorb?
Tell us what the experience needs to do, what the timeline looks like, and what the design handoff situation is. We'll scope what a concurrent development team would cost and whether the timeline is achievable.
